Posted by 
New Year’s Day 2012 kicked in with the gruesome news of the body of a murdered woman found on Royal property at Sandringham in Norfolk, England. The following day I overheard a US television station reporting the story. The American presenter was talking to a reporter in England and he asked how this would affect the Royals. The response was the mind-boggling, “Oh…well, the Royal Family will not come under suspicion.”
This is incredible. Now excuse me, but if a murdered body was found in your backyard, do you really think the police would immediately rule you out of any suspicion? Does it mean that the Royal Family are exempt from prosecution in homicide cases? When did that law come to pass?
Haven’t we encountered a similar situation with the McCanns? Weren’t the McCanns impervious from prosecution and surrounded by similar blind-support of innocence?
The New Year’s Day story came at an appropriate time for Truth for Madeleine. Late in 2011 an alleged, credible source in British intelligence communicated information that would seem to finally explain why the McCanns were given assistance from the highest echelons of the Establishment.
For almost five years, followers of the Madeleine McCann mystery have debated back and forth wondering why the British Establishment stepped in to assist the Tapas 9 in a way never seen before. There have been many missing British children. There have been missing British children abroad. Many Brits have found themselves in legal pickles abroad but they have never had the red carpet treatment. Not, that is, until the McCann Roadshow came along.
A vast array of former policemen spoke of the McCanns’ innocence without having full knowledge of the circumstances. Murdoch owned newspapers like the Sun and the News of the World fawned over Kate and Gerry. Private planes were brought in to ferry the McCanns around like they were superstars. Gerry was nominated for “Scot of the Year” and both he and his wife were on first name terms with two successive British Prime Ministers.
None of it made sense.
When the police file became public in the summer of 2008 we learned that the Portuguese Police were far from the bungling Keystone Cops they were made out to be. They were diligent, thorough, and they were hampered because of an interfering British Government. Evidence was withheld from the Portuguese. A semen sample suddenly turned into a saliva sample after the British Forensic Science Service looked at it. The samples were, in turn, destroyed by the FSS so the investigators have no chance of a second opinion. The McCanns’ financial and medical details were withheld by British government intervention. Bombshell testimony implicating Gerry McCann and David Payne as potential paedophiles was deliberately withheld from Portugal for about five months.
The investigation was never botched by Portugal. Moreover, it was an investigation that was controlled and steered in one direction from day one by the British Establishment. This has never been in doubt as the Portuguese confirmed the presence of MI6 throughout their enquiries in 2007 and 2008.
Forum debaters and amateur sleuths spent hours trying to figure out what was so special about the McCanns. McCann benefactors were scrutinized and their backgrounds explored in an effort to find out why these child-neglecting parents were being let off the hook so easily. There were obvious Freemason connections, pharmaceutical connections, paedophilia connections and hundreds of other possible reasons why the McCanns and their friends were not being investigated properly.
Despite all this, one thing was certain: Gerry McCann had the British Establishment over a barrel. He had some kind of explosive information that was ensuring freedom for him and his wife Kate. This information was so damning that it was to create a gross miscarriage of justice.
Poor little Madeleine was forgotten. The case became a battle against prosecution for Kate and Gerry.
The information received here at TFM is damning but credible. It explains a lot about the case but it requires more study. I can’t reveal the name or contact details of the source and the reader will have to take it for what it is.
The gist of the bombshell information received here is this: Gerry McCann is privy to information implicating the Royal Family in the murder of Princess Diana. This was his leverage.
Let’s look at this chronologically:
Madeleine dies in the first week of May 2007. Reputations and careers would be in tatters, not to mention jail terms for child abuse and possibly murder.
Frantic phone calls and text messages are made back to England and Gerry has his famous “tunnel vision” incident in the church in Praia da Luz. Disclosed later in an interview with Catholic Magazine “The Tablet”, the “tunnel” was his cryptic reference to the Pont de l’Alma tunnel in Paris. Gerry said “I had this mental image of being in a tunnel and instead of the light at the end of the tunnel being extremely narrow and a distant spot, the light opened up…That is when I really felt I had a clear path.”
Gerry did have a clear path. A path that resulted in the British Government assigning Clarence Mitchell to the case on Monday, May 7, 2007.
Sir Tim Bell (now Lord Bell) offered one of his lackeys to assist the McCanns for two weeks until Mitchell was ready to go out to Portugal. This was a pressure time for the McCanns. Daily interviews were taking place and Praia da Luz had become an overnight media circus. In addition, the police were conducting interviews with those present at the time of the disappearance.
Assurances that the Establishment were taking the McCann threat seriously were already coming in. British diplomats in Portugal were being manipulated. Pro-Royal, Murdoch started to spin pro-McCann stories on Sky and in his newspapers. Former cops were drafted in as pro-McCann spin-doctors who blindly asserted that Madeleine’s parents were innocent of anything.
By the time Mitchell arrived in Portugal three weeks after Madeleine’s disappearance, Gerry needed assurances from the Establishment that he was being taken seriously. To this end, Prince Charles and Camilla made a press release that came out of Clarence House on May 27, 2007. They were giving their full support. The single sentence press release said
“The Prince of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall said they had been following the case of missing Madeleine McCann “closely and with deep concern” and “fervently hoped” she would be reunited with her family.” Another indication of Royal influence came from McCann in his blog when he wrote “The rest of us attended mass which was very emotional as a priest from RAF Lossiemouth was visiting and further prayers were said for Madeleine.”
RAF Lossiemouth in Scotland is a significant location for Prince Charles having been flown there as a boy when he attended school at Gordonstoun which is just a mile from the military base.
June was when the McCanns did the bulk of their Grand European Tour and a plethora of Sirs and Lords appeared on the scene. Sir Richard Branson, Sir Philip Green, Sir Tom Hunter, Sir Christopher Meyer, Lord Stevens and not forgetting that Lord Tim Bell had already given his support the previous month. The connection between these people is that they were all endorsed by the Royal Family. They were knighted by the Queen. While the credentials of these people were discussed on the Internet, everyone overlooked the fact that the benefactors had all been honoured by the Royal Family.
Gerry McCann making his speech at the Police Bravery Awards attended by Prince Charles and Gordon Brown.
July proved a difficult month for the McCanns. Three of their Tapas friends were reinterviewed in Portimão on Wednesday July 11, 2007. Gerry McCann returned to London the same day as a guest of Gordon Brown and Prince Charles at the Police Bravery Awards sponsored by the Sun Newspaper. Gerry tried to disguise this because in his blog he didn’t mention who had invited him and he entered the blog entry on Thursday July 12, 2007. The event took place on the evening of July 11 – the previous night. Gerry’s presence there was to meet with Brown and Prince Charles. Note: Many websites have repeated this error and reported Gerry’s presence in London as taking place on the Thursday.
In early August, the British police took the cadaver dogs to Portugal and arranged to search properties occupied by the McCanns. This resulted in some incriminating finds that were subsequently disclosed in the media in the first week of September. This was a time of maximum heat for the McCanns. Press coverage was at fever pitch and the case had turned on its head. Now the McCanns were public enemy #1 and the Establishment spin looked like it wasn’t working. Upon fleeing Portugal on Sunday September 9, 2007, we saw signs of the Establishment’s influence on British soil. Special Branch escorted the McCanns home from East Midlands Airport and the Masonic big gun lawyers enter the scene. Kingsley Napley had represented General Pinochet and HRH Princess Michael of Kent. The press speculated that Kingsley Napley’s Michael Caplan QC was helping the McCanns because he was successful in defending Pinochet against extradition to Spain although the real reason was that they were ordered by the Establishment.
The heat didn’t die down in September. The McCanns feared prosecution and they were looking for some monumental change in direction. For all the power plays shown in the previous four months, the Portuguese police were diligently carrying out their homicide investigation. The damning witness statements from the Gaspars had been deliberately delayed [after ‘internal’ directives] and Portugal was still unaware that McCann and Payne had been described as possible sexual perverts by their doctor friends from Birmingham. The main problem with the case from the McCanns’ point of view was their adversary: Inspector Gonçalo Amaral.
While the McCanns were sweating out the summer of 2007, something was developing in England: the Inquest on the death of Princess Diana. The spotlight was about to turn on the British Royal Family once again. Al Fayed and the Daily Express was adamant that Diana had been murdered by the Royal Family. The Inquest was set to start and the Royals could not have Gerry McCann upset the apple cart. On October 1, Prince Charles entered the fray once again. A press release claimed:
AN anonymous tip-off to the Prince of Wales has sent UK police on an urgent hunt for a new suspect in the Madeleine McCann case.
The email – sent via Prince Charles’ website – claimed a disgruntled former employee of the Portuguese resort where the toddler went missing, could be behind her disappearance. It claimed Madeleine was abducted from the Praia da Luz apartment in revenge against the complex’s owners.
It is understood police have confirmed the woman named in the email did work at the resort when Madeleine was last seen 150 days ago. Royal aides have passed the email on to Scotland Yard, which is now trying to trace the author.
A police source told London newspaper The News of the World: “There have been hundreds of Madeleine theories, sightings and tips sent into UK cops from members of the public. But this one is different. “It’s incredibly detailed and so far, from the inquiries being made in Portugal, it appears to be based on factual events.”
Police believe that the tipster entrusted the information to Prince Charles because he and wife Camilla came out in support of Maddie’s parents Kate and Gerry.
In the biggest power play of the Establishment so far, their next move demonstrated to Gerry just how far they could operate. The British Establishment arranged for Gonçalo Amaral to be sacked on the day the Inquest on the death of Princess Diana commenced.
Unknown at the time, the public waited for months in expectation of a result from the Forensic Science Service. It never came. It was buried and destroyed. Once the investigation was on British soil there was no way the Establishment would allow the incriminating evidence to see the light of day. Not until the public could see the police file in the summer of 2008 would we realize that the FSS participated in a monumental cover up. But then this was par for the course. The same forces that manipulated the Princess Diana evidence were at work here.
The McCanns were all smiles come April 2008. They were not part of the rogatory interviews and instead of staying close to home and Leicester, they set off for the European Parliament on their pretendy Amber Alert campaign. The key date here is April 7, 2008. This is the day that the Princess Diana Inquest returned a verdict:
Diana and Dodi were unlawfully killed by the “grossly negligent driving of the following vehicles and of the Mercedes” adding that additional factors were “the impairment of the judgment of the driver of the Mercedes through alcohol” and “the death of the deceased was caused or contributed to by the fact that the deceased was not wearing a seat-belt, the fact that the Mercedes struck the pillar in the Alma Tunnel, rather than colliding with something else.
17-year old Alisa Dmitrijeva found dead at Sandringham on New Year's Day.
Beyond April 2008, the Royals were under no more significant threat from Gerry. They had played their part in helping to keep the McCanns from prosecution and the threat hanging over their heads vanished once the Inquest returned that famous verdict. It is sad but true that the power of the British Establishment can cover up death as easy as it can take a life.
Today, the dead girl found on the Sandringham Estate was finally identified as 17-year old. Sadly, there will be little help from the Royals. USA Today reported
Buckingham Palace has declined to comment saying it is a matter for the police.
R.I.P. Alisa Dmitrijeva, Princess Diana, Madeleine McCann.
Links:
- Gerry’s Blogs (here).
- Prince of Wales’ Website (here).
- Lord Stevens claim that the McCanns are innocent (here). Stevens led Operation Paget – the whitewash investigation into Princess Diana conspiracy theories.
- Madeleine “Sighting” near Montpellier, France. CCTV analysed by same French Forensic lab involved in Princess Diana case (here).
- Clarence Mitchell was heavily involved in post-Diana Royal stories for the BBC as reported (here). Mitchell is an MI6 agent.
- Sir Alec Jeffreys – DNA Pioneer, ironically also from Leicester who blindly supported the McCanns (here). He has several Royal affiliations: Royal Society Member (here), honoured by Prince Charles (here), Honorary Fellow of the Royal Society of Medicine (here).
- Clarence Mitchell flew to Sydney Australia to cover the death of former INXS singer Michael Hutchence. Ironically, Hutchence died shortly after Princess Diana in a hotel where Diana stayed the year before her death. Hutchence also performed for Prince Charles and Princess Diana. What did he know about Diana’s death? (read more here).
- One major McCann supporter was Dai Davies – a Former Head of Royal Protection and Chief Superintendent (Divisional Commander) Metropolitan Police Service. In 1995, Davies was hired as Operational Unit Commander in charge of Royal Protection for HM The Queen and the Royal Family. He was responsible for Palace and Personal Protection throughout the United Kingdom and worldwide. He inherited a command size of 450 personnel and a total resource budget of £26 million. Davies spectacularly shot himself in the foot with his nonsensical comments in support of the McCanns. But, of course, he was a Royal protector during the time Lady Diana died. Read more (here).
- The Metropolitan Police doing a “review” of the case are actually the Belgravia Police – conveniently located a walking distance away from the seat of the Royal Family at Buckingham Palace.
- The Duke of Westminster (Royal Family member and a big landowner in Belgravia) is the wealthy neighbour of Brian Kennedy in Cheshire.
January 9th, 2012 at 10:11 am
But if this is all true – then your statement: “It is sad but true that the power of the British Establishment can cover up death as easy as it can take life” should have dealt with the McCanns – why bother with all the ‘fixes’ and allow them to walk free. Another car accident would have been a lot quicker and cleaner.
January 9th, 2012 at 2:08 pm
Angelique, watch the movie “Three Days of the Condor”. If you have explosive dirt on someone you protect your life before letting them know what you have.
February 15th, 2012 at 5:45 pm
There is a lot there to be thinking about!
Why would Gerry have information into the death of Diana? what would his connection be? surely if he was involved in any way shape or form then there would be official documentation of such involvement (i mean in dealing with the inquest or anything? just wondering how a common GP would get to be involved in something of that scale) how would he have information to such a degree that he would be seen as a threat by the royal family – how loose would the cover up have been in relation to Diana if a Scottich GP knew of such incriminating evidence.
Im not sticking up for the M/C`s as previously blogged my feelings over this case, however information to the contrary has to be credible – can we really belive that the people at the centre of this terrible situation are also involved in some way or have such incriminating evidence that they demand the support of British Intelligence and the Royal Family to keep their silence over the death of Princess Diana, in exchange for the afer-mentioned silence in the dissapearence of their daughter Maddy -
I just don`t know if its stretching the realms of logical connections?
The statements of the Royals are there for all to see and obviously you cant deny those or the dates etc.. which all seem to form links, however we don`t know if Charles decided getting behind the Mcanns would improve his public image especially to the mothers out there who probably had him blamed for Diana`s death regardless? there is allways another way to look or analyse something, who said for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction?
If the British establishment where so far behind the Mcanns – in the knowledge that they where protecting guilty people then why would they have sent the dog handler with the blood and cadaver dogs? In my opinion its the evidenc ethat these dogs serve up that is the most damming to the Mcanns so surely this would have had to of been seen as a bad move? the dogs sent are the best in the business – proof out there – thats why for me we have to go on the side of the evidence from these dogs as they have no agenda apart from wanting a treat fro doing good work!
I`d be interested to know how the enguiry by Scotland Yard is going on and if this has turned up anything else or are we just presuming that this will be a cover up also?
February 29th, 2012 at 6:13 pm
Hi dear Steve. As I was sent your great post by a friend, and it caught my attention, I have shared it on The Lost Marketing Ploy blog. You are welcome to have a look there as someone has left another big “coincidential” element in the comments: http://thelostmarketingploy.blogspot.com/2012/02/mccanns-above-law.html
-you may just pop in whenever you wish. Use any info from the blog freely. Take care, Mega FUND-Line
March 11th, 2012 at 5:17 pm
It is rather odd though that they are getting all this support from people high up. That poor girl that was found dead in the royal grounds, prince charles didn.t comment and said it was a police matter. Then surely to god the mccann’s business is a police matter, but no they’ve now got 30 scotland yard detectives looking into the investigation why put all that into something that happened abroad and the parents were to blame for what happened to that little girl i.e leaving her and two siblings alone in a foreign country while they got drunk why is all that man power and it will cost millions that the met can.t afford, why are they getting preferential treatment, unless they know something im sorry to say this but that fund that was set up to look for that child has been used to sue a number of people that talk sense. The investigator for one knows what happened he got fired and then they tried to stop his book using money to find their daughter. If you ask me they know something at least.
March 14th, 2012 at 9:36 pm
Wow!!! At last, an explanation that ticks all the boxes in the enormous establishment cover-up, I was with the Team Paedophilia, I couldn’t imagine anything else so big that it’s silenced the media, closed down websites and all manner of other stuff. Now, if this is true (and it’s not beyond the realms of possibility) it would wipe away 99.9% of the niggly bits. It’s true that it would, perhaps, have been a better idea to set up a car crash or any other fatal event, but you can be sure that they’ve got ‘proof to back-up’ what they’re alleging, hidden in a very safe place, just in case something should happen to them then the truth will out. They’re good at hiding things, especially little girls. Besides Gerry’s really enjoying all this fame and power, but the stupid sod can’t see what a stupid sod he is, patronising us with his ridiculous explanations – dirty nappies, meat juices, cadaverine di da di da, and as for ‘it was like dining in the garden, now that would be at the end of a, let’s say, 80 metre garden, in some bushes, and leaving the bloody FRONT DOOR WIDE OPEN!!
Maybe it was one of those friends of a friend of a friends type scenario, probably within the medical fraternity, it happens. This now leaves me puzzled about the Tapas 7, were they in on this? Yes probably, if only because jumped up Gerry wouldn’t have been able to contain himself, because he needs his regular fix of smug, self satisfied, boastful, arrogant, weasely, lying, stinking, pervy, murdering bastard!! Other than that, he’s not a bad bloke………….
The establishment, that he threatened to spill the beans about, would secretly despise someone like Gerry, pervy little upstart snitch, just keep watching your back Gerry, you are really not as important or, as clever as you’ve been led to believe.
You’ll sup sorrow with a BIG spoon, you two. Trust me.
April 12th, 2012 at 6:01 pm
WHOOSH CLUNK is coming for this pair of fraudsters and child neglectors. Little accident ? Yes, watch your back Gerry the establishment don’t like being held to ransom and remember this, you are replacable. BOO they going to rid themselves of pesky mccann pests that make DEMANDS.
April 15th, 2012 at 4:23 pm
Have read somewhere very recently, that Gerry was put on the sex offenders list in 2002, have no idea if it’s true, but, given the Gaspar’s statements, I wouldn’t be surprised, I don’t think anything I read about these people (and I use the term very loosely) will surprise me ever again.
They are totally without any remorse, except not being there when Madeleine was abducted, and we don’t believe the abduction bollocks now. Whilst they’ve railroaded their abduction fantasy, tearing down everything and everyone who said different. They’ve lost people their livelihoods, shredded a ‘good copper’s’ reputation and integrity, (my highest respect comes to you Goncalo Amarel, you will be vindicated), lost people tourism, frightened other holiday-makers present past and future, implicated others who were entirely innocent, refused to act on police instructions, lied through their teeth, made pensioners and children part with money they didn’t really have, not to help search for Madeleine, but to pay for the best briefs in the country, whilst they paid their Mortgage and danced cheek to cheek, with another load of arseholes who call themselves the upper echelons, and our betters. I could go on all night. I know journalists have had bad press themselves on this, their hands may have been tied, but not their minds, they’ve got all this well covered, they’re just waiting for the shit to hit the fan, and it will, but not soon enough for me.
April 25th, 2012 at 2:45 pm
I wsouldn’t be at all surprised if Madeleine’s disappearance is in some way tied up with the establishment-cover-up of Hollie Greig…
April 25th, 2012 at 6:19 pm
Just watched Panorama tonight about the ‘Review’ of Madeleine’s disappearance. Apparently, so far, since Cameron gave the go-ahead to revisit this case, it has cost £2million and quite a bit of police manpower and time. Panorama seems to think it had something to do with Cameron at the time being lent on by the Murdoch empire – which makes sense. Trouble is, pretty pointless, because most of the forensics have been destroyed and as far as I can understand, as I have been interested in following this intriguing case over the years, in my view, any real tangible roads of inquiry have been destroyed and dismissed already by the British police and establishment.
There have been a lot of conspiracy theories around the McCann case – Murat, Inflatable Signs, The Mason’s, illegal adoption and the Diana – Royal Family connection, which just goes to show how much people are intrigued by this and will go to great lengths to research and find some connection. Go far enough, and there will always seem to be a connection. We already know that there are just ‘six degrees of separation’ to anyone in the world. My advice is to keep it simple, read all the evidence which is available on many sites and reach your own conclusion. The facts are there!
April 28th, 2012 at 9:32 pm
It seems to me that if the McCann’s are being ‘looked after’ by any authority from the Freemasons to any other powerful illuminati type organisation, what MI6, MI5, who….that they would in fact be getting very short shrift by now. Highly organised groups of people go out of their way to ‘protect their own’ if it is of VALUE for them to keep doing so and if they have some form of INVESTMENT in doing so. That would normally involve vast amounts of money or power or control of politics, not making it OK for a control freak and his codependent wife who have done something unsavoury with a young girl. What would be the value or investment in protecting this two lying fools who just won’t let it drop. Usually ‘cover-ups’ become exactly that…. silenced, quieted, never mentioned again. The actions of the McCanns have been pedestrian, clumsy, see-through, inept, annoying, persistent, and they just wont GO AWAY. I agree that maybe at first people on a high level felt perhaps they don’t deserve to be struck off, banged up abroad, have their twins removed, accused of murder at worst or manslaughter at best, accused of drugging their child with wrongfully obtained adult medication. Then there are the ‘professional’ friends, other doctors. Looks a bit bad to be associated with child murderers, so they have their own reasons for covering up a situation. But does it really go THAT high up or THAT sinister…. Gerry is a sociopath, a control freak, a severely personality disordered person with interpersonal problems – look at the video where he is about to go out on holiday ‘fuck off… I’m not here to enjoy myself’, his body language, his words, everything. Maybe trapped in an unhappy marriage, maybe a sex offender, maybe attracted to little girls, maybe organising that with friends but on a very low key low level most likely if at all. That death was clearly an accident no matter what. Nobody wants to have a dead child on their hands whether its by way of lashing out too harshly during punishing them, by way of giving her sleeping pills and her knocking her head open bleeding to death, a sex offence on a tiny child gone wrong… but not premeditated. These people may be ‘professionals’ who pertain to lord it over the average working class person but they are SMALL FRY in masonic terms, in illuminati terms. Groups of people like those will only extend a little assistance so far. They won’t put their entire reputation on the lines for a couple of dimwits – him thinking no-one notices what an absolute tosser he is and her looking all gormless codependent and acting like his puppet. And they refuse to go away and shut up. Their time will be up for no other reason than that. Now they need the money to keep defending themselves physically, legally, but no-one will keep supplying it and the general public no longer believe they’re telling the truth. Anyone ‘looking after them’ will shortly drop them like a hot potato. Expect soon there will be documentaries examining their body language and actual words, when they can no longer fend off the truth. And I hope the TRUTH comes soon.
May 7th, 2012 at 9:23 am
I have been a fan of these posts not to mention the book for a very long time.
However, while I accept that the McCanns had contacts which enabled their escape. Saying they had knowledge of the Diana tragedy is total insanity. Further that somehow this is tied into the Royal Family. What a load of horse shite. Seriously, I hope that this crap doesn’t go on. You have written some superb articles and raised some good issues. Please don’t wreak it by going down this avenue.
I beg you.
Jim!
Site Admin: Why do you think the police in England who are reviewing the case are based in Belgravia? Who owns most of Belgravia and where is it situated? Why do you think Brian Kennedy in Cheshire (the Duke of Westminster’s neighbour) was involved? The McCanns received Special Branch assistance due to Royal involvement…end of.
May 22nd, 2012 at 3:14 am
Wow, what fascinating reading this website is proving to be. I was a huge supporter of the McCanns when all of this first happened and then as the years have gone by I have started to question a lot of things (especially the fact that they left the kids alone) what has prompted me to visit alternative sites to theirs is that I have just read the most recent edition of Kate’s book “Madeleine” and there was a lot in there that I felt was all very one-sided from someones diary which of course could just be made up as she went along or at least changed before submitting for publication!
In answer to a comment above. Gerry is not a GP but a consultant cardiologist – not that this would make a particular difference to what he might or might not know about Diana/Royal Family but presume he moves in different circles to his wife and be party to information a GP might not be. Anyway more comments might follow from me as I read through more of this site. Very, very interesting.
June 18th, 2012 at 12:31 pm
It’s a curious reference that Gerry McCann has made and it sounds as though it’s about Diana. I can’t believe that his power to get the Establishment, including Royals, falling over themselves to pander to him is derived from knowledge about Di’s ritual murder that no one else knows about. Anyone threatening Them with blackmail would soon find themesleves the victim of an state-organised “suicide” or mistakenly shot on a tube train.
If glue that binds the Establishment together is based on perversions that none of us would like to think about then I’d suggest that the Establishment are looking after the McCanns because they’re returning a favour; and they want to send a message to others like the McCann’s that they’d be taken care of as well.
July 13th, 2012 at 4:20 am
Yet another seedy establishment member rather too close to this case
The Duke and the hookers
http://notwats.blogspot.co.uk/2007/02/duke-hookers-he-pays-for-sex-as.html
Reply: And yes, the Duke of Westminster lives close to Brian Kennedy in Cheshire. There is definitely a Royal connection to this story. The so-called Metropolitan Police investigating the story are actually the closest police to Buckingham Palace – the Belgravia Police. The Duke of Westminster owns pretty much most of Belgravia doesn’t he?
July 22nd, 2012 at 4:48 pm
Sorry but if Gerry had had info on the Diana “murder” they could just have bumped him off, couldn’t they, like they “killed” Diana? I think some kind of Masonic link is involved or possibly they know something embarrassing (of a paedophile nature) about someone very important
Reply. Watch the 1975 movie “Three Days of the Condor” and understand how this stuff works. People who have incriminating information on others can’t just be “bumped off”. That’s for Hollywood but this was reality.
July 29th, 2012 at 12:24 pm
Kate McCann is now a semi zombie. Apparantly she does not talk and is very submissive. She is only wheeled out for the annual May 3rd begging day & sofa tv interviews and charity running pics Do you think McCann was one of the heart Doctors who saw to Diana ? Gerry does have a CATS reg no for paedophilia. Look up the Gaspar statements
August 30th, 2012 at 9:06 pm
This is a load of rubbish. There were a limited member of Freemasons- over a century ago!- that had enormous power and influence. But your average Freemasons Lodge these days has no power and no influence. You people who write this stuff really need to get an education in history. The Mccanns are practising catholics. Freemasonry is not a focus of Gerry’s life, any more than being a member of a Rotary club might be. There is unlikely to be much of a connection between the Pope and the Royals, and yet people continue to speculate that the British establishment were also behind the Mccanns public visit with the Pope! Gerry Mccann is a cardiologist, working in a government training hospital. He is not some incredibly powerful, rich, influential being that has inside information about Princess Diana. Mr. Amaral has admitted that he made endless errors at the time, and if you bother to really study his ‘documentary’, you will see he made some very obvious BLUNDERS. Concalo Amaral begins his documentary stating that Madeleine’s body was stored in the cupboard. At the end, however, he tells us that Madeleine died by accident because she fell head first behind the couch. Gerry then came in, minutes afterwards, picked up her dead body, walked down to the beach, and threw it in the sea. So, when was the body stored in the cupboard? I saw this contradiction as soon as I watched this ridiculous ‘documentary’ with its C Grade Horror Movie music underscoring the words. But Mr. Amaral, a police man, and the head of an investigation over a missing child, made a documentary ‘thriller’ that your average teenager would have done better. And all the Mccann haters, who claim Amaral as some kind of Guru, never picked it up either! As usual, the author of this piece of nonsense, is unable to provide a ‘source’. Apparently it’s coming. Well, it’s now well into 2012, so WHO is the source?
October 16th, 2012 at 11:55 am
Great article!
October 18th, 2012 at 8:56 pm
Hmmmh!
Don’t be sooo harsh!
If I’d OD’d my kids on Robbitussin I’d admit it all…
Oh!
Hang on!
I didn’t… So I take it all back!! The McCanns are sooo v.v. innocent!
October 18th, 2012 at 9:01 pm
Hmmh…So NR@89 and Mt’PM weren’t arrested within 24 hrs of’t ’98 Russell murder after being ‘dared’ to do it to become eligible for 2xGMs?
Hmmh!!! Grow up Marion W… or whoever you are!!
December 5th, 2012 at 10:01 pm
Marion Webster, you’ve made a simple, rash mistake, that anyone would kick themselves about if they did. But it’s definitely a mistake.
You say the Amaral programme claimed
- Madeleine McCann died by a fall on the floor
- Her body was hidden in the cupboard
- She was taken to the sea
There’s not even a bit of contradiction in that.
If the girl died by a wound to the head and was not abducted, then her body was hidden in the cupboard for a while, perhaps a day and night until May 3rd, perhaps only a few hours from before the group went to dinner.
Some hours would probably be enough anyway to leave cadaver for a few months.
Obviously, the programme didn’t suggest a body was left in the appartment when the police called. Amaral knows his men looked. The programme does suggest the body was taken away, from the copboard – towards the sea, and went into the sea or left somehow for later, perhaps in a car.
You’ve mistake the time gap between hypothetical death and G McCann allegedly carrying the girl as if she were alive, later. Amaral knows it had to be long enough to leave the cadaver scent the trained cadaver dog picked up.
It’s not my theory. It’s Amaral’s. But there isn’t the contradiction you suggested at all.
April 30th, 2013 at 12:29 am
[...] Truth for Madeline [...]